Reading up on AVIF
3 deep · digging since dec 02, 25
- The case against JPEG XL
JPEG XL underperforms AVIF in lossy compression and decode speed, making it unnecessary for the Web despite advantages for non-web use cases like professional photography.
- Guillaume Técher
Chrome uses JPEG partial IDCT scaling to decode only low-frequency data when rendering images at small scales, causing icons to render thicker due to lost edge detail, a behavior not shared by Firefox.
- Google unkills JPEG XL?
Google's Chromium team reversed its decision to drop JPEG XL support, now planning to implement it in Blink, which could make it a de facto standard for images.